Exergoeconomic Analysis of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Based Trigeneration System with External Reformer and Dimethyl Ether

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Urmia University, Urmia,

Abstract

In the present study, Exergoeconomic analysis of a combined solid oxide fuel cell with  a gas turbine, a generator-absorber heat exchanger and heating process heat exchanger for heating, cooling and power production as a tri-generation system is conducted. An external steam reformer is applied to convert di-methyl ether as oxygenated fuel to hydrogen for the electrochemical process of the solid oxide fuel cell. The influence of the primary design parameters (fuel utilization factor and anode inlet temperature) on several variables (energy and exergy efficiencies, exergy destruction and unit costs of the power) are examined. Results show that energy efficiency of proposed system is 38% higher than standalone solid oxide fuel cell. It was found that the maximum exergy destructions occurred in afterburner, solid oxide fuel cell and recuperator. An increase in anode inlet temperature leads to reduction of exergy destruction in afterburner and fuelcell. Unit cost of power is equal to 23.51 $⁄GJ and decreases with an increase in fuel utilization factor or increasing of anode inlet temperature. Increasing of utilization factor will increase all exergy efficiencies by 12%. The effect of increase in anode inlet temperature on exergy efficiencies is positive but compared with the other parameter is lower and will increase them by 8%.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1] Energy Information Administration, International Energy Outlook, U.S.A, (2009).
[2] CHP: Evaluating the benefits of greater global investment, International Energy Agency, France, (2008).
[3] T. Kerr, CHP and emissions trading options for policy makers, International Energy Agency, USA, (2008).
[4]  Office of Administration U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Laboratories for the 21st Century, Energy Efficiency Resources Management In partnership with the U.S. Department of Energy, and Renewable Energy. On-site power systems for laboratories, (2003).
[5]  EG, G-Services & National Energy Technology Laboratory (U.S.), Fuel Cell Handbook. Morgantown, WV: U.S. Dept. of Energy,  Office of Fossil Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory, (2004).
[6] M. Burer, K. Tanaka, Multi-criteria  optimization of a district cogeneration plant integrating a solid oxide fuel cell-gas turbine combinedcycle, heat pumps and chillers, Energy, 28(6) (2003) 497–518.
[7]  C. Weber, M. Koyama, S. Kraines, CO2-emissions reduction potential and costs of a decentralized energy system for providing electricity, cooling and heating in an office-building in tokyo, Energy, 31(14) (2006) 2705–2725.
[8] M. Zenouzi,G. J. Kowalski, Selection of distributed power-generating systemsbasedon electric, heating, and cooling loads, Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 128(3) (2006) 268-177.
[9]  J. J. Wang, Y. Y. Jing, C. F. Zhang, A fuzzy multicriteriadecision-making model for trigeneration system, Energy Policy, 36(10) (2008) 3823-3832.
[10] A. Chitsaz, S. M. Mahmoudi, M. Rosen, Greenhouse gas emission  and  exergy  analyses  of an integrated trigeneration system driven by a solid oxide fuelcell, Applied Thermal Engineering, (2015).
[11] F. Ranjbar, A. Chitsaz, S. M. Mahmoudi, SH. Khalilarrya, M. Rosen, Energy and exergy assessments of a novel trigeneration system based on a SOFC, Energy Conversion and Manageement, 87(1) (2014) 318-327.
[12] M. wang, Y. Zhequan, Thermodynamic analysis of a new combined cooling, heat and power system driven by solid oxide fuel cell based on ammonia, Journal of Power Sources, 196(1) (2011) 8463-8471.
[13] I. Dincer, Energy and Exergy analyses of direct ammonia solid oxide fuel cell integrated with gas turbine power cycle, Journal of Power Sources, 212(1) (2012) 73-85.
[14] P. Leone, A. lanzini, G.A. Ortigoza-Villalba, R. borchiellini, operation of a solid oxide fuelcell under direct internal reforming of liquid fuels, Chemical Engineering Journal, 191(1) (2012) 349-355.
[15] D. Cocco, V. Tola, Externally reformed solid oxide fuel cell- microgas turbine hybrid systems fueled by methanol and di methyl ether, Energy, 34 (2009) 2124-2130.
[16] C. Su, R. Ran, W. Wang, Z. Shao, Coke formation and performance of an intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cell operating on dimethyl ether fuel, , Power Source, 196 (2011) 1967-1974.
[17] P.V. Snytnikov, S.D. Badmaev, G.G. Volkova, D.I. Potemkin, M.M. Zyryanova, Catalysts for hydrogen production in a multifuel processor by methanol, dimethyl ether and bioethanol steam reforming  for fuel cell applications, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37 (2012) 16388-16396.
[18] K. Sato, Y. Tanaka, A. Negishi, T. Kato, Dual fuel type solid oxide fuel cell using dimethyl ether and liquefied petroleum gas as fuels, Power Source, 217 (2012) 37-42.
[19]  V.  Zare,  S.  Mahmoudi,  M.  Yari,  M. Amidpour, Thermoeconomic analysis and optimization of an ammonia- water power/cooling cogeneration cycle, Energy, 47(1) (2012) 271-283.
[20] F. Calise, M. Dentice d’Accadia, L. Vanoli, M. Von Spakovsky, single elvel optimization of a hybrid SOFC-GT power plant, Power Source, 159(2) (2006) 1169-1185.
[21] T. Semelsberger, R. Broup, Thermodynamic equilibrium calculations of dimethyl ether steam reforming and dimethyl ether hydrolysis, Power Sources, 152(1) (2005) 87-96.
[22] Y. Lwin, W. Wan Daud, A. Mohammad, Z. Yaakob, Hydrogen production from steam-methanol reforming: thermodynamic analysis, Hydrogen Energy, 25 (2000) 47-53.
[23] I. Fishtik, A. Alexander, R. Datta, D. Geana, A thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production by steam reforming of ethanol via response reactions, Hydrogen Energy, 25 (2000) 31-45.
[24] D. Cocco, V. Tola, Use of alternative hydrogen energy carriers in SOFC–MGT hybrid power plants, Energy Conversion and Management, 50 (2009) 1040-1048.
[25] G. Tao, T. Armestrang, A. Vikar, Intermidiate Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (IT-SOFC) Research and Development Activities at MSRI, Nineteenth Annual ACERC and ICES Confrence, UT, USA, (2005).
[26] F. Ranjbar, A. Chitsaz, S.M. Mahmoudi, Sh. Khalil Arrya, M. Rosen, Energy and exergy assessments of a novel trigeneration system based on a SOFC, Energy  Conversion  and  Management,  87 (2014) 318-327.
[27] Y. lee, K. Ahn, T. Morosuk, Exergetic and exergoeconomic evaluation of a solid- oxide fuel- cell-based combined heat and power generation system, Energy Conversion and Management, 85 (2014) 154-64.
[28]  B. Najafi, A. Shirazi, M. Aminyavari, F. Rinaldi, R. Taylor, Exergetic, economic and enviromental analyses and multi- objective optimization of an SOFC-gas turbine hybrid cycle coupled with an MSF desalination system, Desalination, 334(1) (2014) 46-59.
[29] Y. D. Lee, Thermodynamic, econmic and enviromental evaluation of solid oxide fuel cell hybrid power generation system, Berlin University, Berlin, (2015).
[30] A. Mehr, V. Zare, S.M. Mahmoudi, Standard  GAX versus hybrid GAX absorption refrigeration cycle: from the view of thermoeconomics, Energy Conversion and Management, 76(1) (2013) 68-82.
[31] S. Assabumrungrat, W. Sangtongkitcharoen, Effects of electrolyte type and flow pattern on performance of methanol-fuelled solid oxide fuel cells, Journal of Power Sources, (2005) 18-23.
[32] S. Singhal, High temperature SOFCs fundamentals, design and applications, Elsevier, (2003).