The Experimental Study of Effective Characteristics on Differential Pressure Value Setting of Quarter-turn Actuator in Gas Transportation Pipelines

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Babol University of Technology, Babol, Iran

Abstract

Actuators with line-break detection system can be used in the zones with no access to national electricity network, hazardous or impassable area enclosure, for passive defense conditions or to protect different ecosystems such as rivers and ground water, forests and fertile land and etc. In this paper, the effects of orifice diameter, pipeline initial pressure and pipeline pressure drop rate on the setting differential pressure in a quarter turn Scotch-Yoke actuator have been studied by 81 tests. The nitrogen gas was used in this experimental study. The actuator differential pressure is increased by the growth of pipeline pressure drop rate or reduction of orifice diameter or pipeline initial pressure. The occurrence time of maximum differential pressure of diaphragm valve depends just on orifice diameter. This time is independent of pipeline pressure drop rate or pipeline initial pressure. It increases with the decrease of orifice diameter. The curves of actuator differential pressure which is generated by different pipeline pressure drop rates are proposed for different pipeline initial pressures and orifice diameters. The values of curves in this diagram with 10 percent safety factor can be used in differential pressure value setting of quarter-turn actuator installed on gas transportation pipelines.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1] B. Nesbitt, Handbook of Valves and Actuators: Valve and actuators selection, Chapter 19, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2011.
[2] P. Zhang, Advanced industrial Control Technology: A Handbook for engineers and researchers, Chapter 1, Sensors and actuators for industrial control, 2010.
[3] G.H. Wang and W.F. Zhang, The determination method of proper value of pressure drop rate pipe for the fast block valve on pipeline, Ph.D. Thesis, China University of Petroleum Beijing, 2004.
[4] W.L. Wang, Y.H. Gao and J.B. Lai, Setting of pressure drop rate in pipe burst detection system on natural gas pipeline block valve, Gas Heat, 33.7 (2013) 19-23.
[5] L. Zuo, F. Jiang, and B. Jin, Value setting for the rate of pressure drop of automatic line-break control valves in natural gas pipelines, Journal of Natural Gas Sciences and Engineering, 26 (2015) 803-809.
[6] G.M. Harriott, Gas pipeline simulation: leak detection, In: 42nd Annual Meeting of the Pipeline Simulation Interest Group (PSIG), Pipeline Simulation Interest Group, Houston, TX, (2011).
[7] R. Noguerol, Pipeline control modes and their effect on model-based leak detection, In: 42nd Annual Meeting of the Pipeline Simulation Interest Group (PSIG), Pipeline Simulation Interest Group, Houston, TX, 2011.
[8] H.P. Reddy, S. Narasimhan and S.M. Bhallamudi, Leak detection in gas pipeline networks using an efficient state estimator. Part-I: theory and simulations, Comput. Chem. Eng., 35.4 (2011a) 651-661.
[9] H.P. Reddy, S. Narasimhan and S.M. Bhallamudi, Leak detection in gas pipeline networks using an efficient state estimator. Part II. Experimental and field evaluation, Comput. Chem. Eng., 35.4 (2011b) 662-670.
[10] S.A.M. Lacerda, G.P. Elias, The use of pipeline simulation to analyse the effects of a gas pipeline rupture, In: 41st Annual Meeting of the Pipeline Simulation Interest Group (PSIG), Pipeline Simulation Interest Group, Houston, TX, (2010).
[11] M. AL-Rasheed, A. Brell and S. Al-Qaffas, Pipeline rupture consequences mitigation comprehensive study, In: 41st Annual Meeting of the Pipeline Simulation Interest Group (PSIG), Pipeline Simulation Interest Group, Houston, TX, (2010).
[12] R.M. Peekema, Causes of natural gas pipeline explosive ruptures, J. Pipeline Syst. Eng. Pract., 4.1 (2013) 74-80.
[13] F. Richards, Failure analysis of a natural gas pipeline rupture, J. Fail. Anal. Prev, 13.6 (2013) 653-657.
[14] T.T. Phan and A.J. Sawin, Automatic Linebreak Control Valve Case Study, In: 43rd Annual Meeting of the Pipeline Simulation Interest Group (PSIG), Pipeline Simulation Interest Group, Houston, TX, (2012).